The WardJanuary 21, 2011
A thriller centered on an institutionalized young woman who becomes terrorized by a ghost.
Release Year: 2010
Rating: 5.6/10 (12,187 voted)
Critic's Score: 38/100
Stars: Amber Heard, Mamie Gummer, Danielle Panabaker
In 1966, in North Bend, Oregon, the runaway Kristen is captured by the police after burning down a farmhouse and is locked in the North Bend Psychiatric Hospital. Kristen is introduced to Dr. Gerald Stringer, who uses experimental therapy. Then she meets the inmates Emily, Sarah, Zoey and Iris and the tough nurse Lundt. During the night and in the shower later, Kristen sees the ghost of a woman and she learns that she is Alice Leigh Hudson, a mysterious wicked intern that has disappeared. When Iris is ready to go home, she is attacked by the ghost of Alice in the basement and murdered. She vanishes and the inmates decide to seek Iris out. Then Sarah is abducted by the Alice and also killed; the next one is Emily. Meanwhile Kristen escapes from her room and meets Zoey, expecting to protect her. However, Zoey is kidnapped by Alice and Kristen runs to Dr. Stringer's office. She snoops his desk and finds a report with the truth about Alice.
Writers: Michael Rasmussen, Shawn Rasmussen
(as Dan Anderson)
(as Andrea L. Petty)
(as Tracey Schornick)
Only Sanity Can Keep You Alive
Official site |
Release Date: 21 January 2011
Filming Locations: Des Moines, Washington, USA
Box Office Details
Opening Weekend: MYR 55,784
(13 March 2011)
Did You Know?
John Carpenter's first full-length feature film since
Ghosts of Mars, and his first feature not shot in Panavision since his debut
Incorrectly regarded as goofs:
When Kristen enters the rec room the first morning, the original "What's My Line?" is playing on the TV. For the entirety of its run, it only aired on Sundays at 10:30 PM (ET) and was never broadcast in the daytime, not even in repeats. However it's later revealed this most of what 'Kristen' experienced were actually Alice's hallucinations.
Look at me!
Sorry, I don't converse with loonies.
I'm 36 years old and in 1981 the first horror movie I saw was John
Carpenters "Halloween". I was 6 year old and subsequently I became an
úber fan of the Director. I've worshiped the great ones (Assault on
precinct 13, Halloween, The Fog, Escape from New York, The Thing,
Prince of Darkness) enjoyed the good (Christine, Star Man, Big Trouble
in little China, They Live, In the mouth of madness, Vampires) and
stomached the bad (Escape from L.A, Village of the damned, Memoirs ,
Ghosts of Mars). "The Ward" seems to fall into all of these categories.
Sometimes it's great, more often than not it's good but regrettably
when it's bad it's really bad. Perhaps it was the lack of a traditional
Carpenter score (although the score by Mark Kilian is suitably
haunting, memorable and atmospheric) or maybe it was the somewhat
derivative "jump" scares or could it have been the inconsistent overall
tone because to me it felt like I was watching a movie made by someone
trying to emulate Carpenter rather than a movie by "The Master"
himself. Don't get me wrong, technically it's excellent and it contains
a few moments of genuine tension but there was something missing from
the ingredients that make a great Carpenter movie and I think that
something is called suspense. It's a shame really because with its
eerie location, its linear, albeit uninspired storyline and its quirky
characters this had the potential to bring the Director back to the top
where he truthfully belongs but throughout I couldn't help feel that
Carpenter's become jaded within the genre. His techniques that were
groundbreaking during his prime have been exploited by every other
Horror Director of the last 20 years. So instead of evolving above this
and carving a revolutionary way forward as he once did so gracefully,
Carpenters now imitating his old self and his techniques just don't
seem to cut it anymore. To be fair it's an enjoyable and fast moving 88
minutes but from an old Pro like John Carpenter I was expecting
something a lot more terrifying. When Carpenter reviewed his initial
cut of "The Fog" back in 79 he found it plodding and just not scary
enough so he went back and re-shot scenes then re-cut it into the
classic it is today. I think if Carpenter had taken the same approach
with this movie it could've been up there with the best of the best but
something tells me that he's become indifferent, lost his passion and
dare I say "only in it for the money". Over time I may grow to love
this like I grew to love "Prince of Darkness" but as of right now it's
left me feeling somewhat dis-satisfied.