Mysterious SkinMarch 30, 2005
A teenage hustler and a young man obsessed with alien abductions cross paths, together discovering a horrible, liberating truth.
Release Year: 2004
Rating: 7.8/10 (30,039 voted)
Critic's Score: 74/100
Stars: Brady Corbet, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Elisabeth Shue
Brian Lackey is determined to discover what happened during an amnesia blackout when he was eight years old, and then later woke with a bloody nose. He believes he was abducted by aliens, and N. McCormick, a fellow player on Brian's childhood baseball team, may be the key as to exactly what happened that night. As Brian searches for the truth and tries to track him down, Neil McCormick takes up hustling and moves to New York, in attempts to forget childhood memories that haunt him. Together, the two of them uncover the terrible truth of the scars they share.
Writers: Gregg Araki, Scott Heim
Neil (Age 8)
Brian (Age 8)
Rachael Nastassja Kraft
Deborah (Age 12)
(as Rachael Kraft)
David Lee Smith
Wendy (Age 11)
Old Man with Scar
Two boys. One can't remember. The other can't forget.
ABC [Australia] |
Release Date: 30 March 2005
Filming Locations: California, USA
Opening Weekend: $17,425
(8 May 2005)
(31 July 2005)
(Sundance Channel Library Print)
Did You Know?
Emile Hirsch auditioned for the role of Neil.
Errors in geography:
The scene of Neal running in downtown New York after leaving his john with AIDS is actually Downtown Los Angeles.
The summer I was 8 years old, five hours disappeared from my life. Five hours. Lost. Gone without a trace.
Last thing I remember I was sitting on the bench at my Little League game. It started to rain. What happened after that remains a pitch black void.
Very strong movie with difficult content
I had high hopes for this film, since I have been a big fan of the
novel on which it is based. The film exceeded my expectations in every
way. Although quite faithful to the book (with many lines of dialogue
and narration moving straight from Scott Heim's poetic prose), the
movie has more drive and focus and pulls you so far into the troubled
characters. Credit for the movie's strength goes all around — director
Araki put his mark on the story without taking it over. He got
uniformily good performances (and somehow managed to direct scenes that
any reader of the book would have thought completely unfilmable).
Kansas has never looked better, or more sinister. The music is used
And the acting is terrific. The two youngest leads, Chase Ellison and
George Webster, were entirely convincing in their scenes (and I hope
they feel proud of their work, seeing as how there's no way they'll get
to see this movie until sometime next decade). Michelle Trachtenberg
and Jeff Licon have fairly thankless roles, playing characters who are
somewhat less clear and crucial in the film than their characters were
in the book. But they don't sweat that, they just play what the screen
play has them do, and they excel. Licon, especially, I think, although
Trachtenberg is at a disadvantage, as her part is really pretty small.
And for me, at least, I think Mary-Lynn Rajskub, Brady Corbet, and
Joseph Gordon-Levitt give about as good performances as one can give.
Rajskub is so good that she gives the other actors in the film a space
to react that is almost visible. Corbet is quiet and intense; if his
performance sometimes lacks motivation, it is probably deliberate, as
his character is struggling with identity and memory. And as for
Gordon-Levitt, man, that guy can act. I really have a hard time
thinking of any acting performance ever that has affected me as much.
It is a difficult story, although I felt it ends hopefully. Hopefully,
you will agree. Content is very strong, although perhaps not NC-17
strong. Not for kids. Adults, if you can get past the 2nd scene, you
can get through it, but there is a lot of outlawed sexuality and
violence. It is painful to watch at times, but to me at least, that's
because the actors and the director managed to immerse me in the