Spy Game

November 21, 2001 0 By Fans
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Still of Brad Pitt and Robert Redford in Spy GameStill of Brad Pitt in Spy GameStill of Robert Redford in Spy GameSpy GameStill of Brad Pitt in Spy GameStill of Robert Redford in Spy Game

Plot

Retiring CIA agent Nathan Muir recalls his training of Tom Bishop while working against agency politics to free him from his Chinese captors.

Release Year: 2001

Rating: 6.9/10 (61,987 voted)

Critic's Score: 63/100

Director:
Tony Scott

Stars: Robert Redford, Brad Pitt, Catherine McCormack

Storyline
CIA operative Nathan Muir (Redford) is on the brink of retirement when he finds out that his protege Tom Bishop (Pitt) has been arrested in China for espionage. No stranger to the machinations of the CIA's top echelon, Muir hones all his skills and irreverent manner in order to find a way to free Bishop. As he embarks on his mission to free Bishop, Muir recalls how he recruited and trained the young rookie, at that time a sergeant in Vietnam, their turbulent times together as operatives and the woman who threatened their friendship.

Writers: Michael Frost Beckner, Michael Frost Beckner

Cast:

Robert Redford

Nathan D. Muir


Brad Pitt

Tom Bishop


Catherine McCormack

Elizabeth Hadley


Stephen Dillane

Charles Harker


Larry Bryggman

Troy Folger


Marianne Jean-Baptiste

Gladys Jennip


Matthew Marsh

Dr. William Byars


Todd Boyce

Robert Aiken


Michael Paul Chan

Vincent Vy Ngo


Garrick Hagon

CIA Director Cy Wilson


Andrew Grainger

Andrew Unger


Bill Buell

Fred Kappler


Colin Stinton

Henry Pollard


Ted Maynard

CIA Administrator


Tom Hodgkins

CIA Lobby Guard

Taglines:
"Poor is the pupil who does not surpass his teacher" (Leonardo Da Vinci)



Details

Official Website:
Universal |

Release Date: 21 November 2001

Filming Locations: Beirut, Lebanon



Box Office Details

Budget: $92,000,000

(estimated)

Opening Weekend: $21,689,125
(USA)
(25 November 2001)
(2770 Screens)

Gross: $143,049,560
(Worldwide)
(2002)



Technical Specs

Runtime:


 |
Turkey:
(TV version)



Did You Know?

Trivia:

The building identified as the US Embassy in Hong Kong is actually the headquarters of HSBC – the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.

Goofs:

Errors made by characters (possibly deliberate errors by the filmmakers):
Muir, after having Bishop elicit a piece of information, tells Bishop he gave out 4 facts about himself (Bishop) for one dubious piece of information: "You're straight, you're engaged, tomorrow is your girl's birthday, and you have no taste in women's fashion… What if she was an asset: You told her four lies that now have to be true." But Bishop *is* straight. He only told 3 lies.

Quotes:

Nathan Muir:
See that building across the way?

Tom Bishop:
Yeah.

Nathan Muir:
Do you know anyone there?

Tom Bishop:
No.

Nathan Muir:
In five minutes I want to see you on the balcony.

Tom Bishop:
What do…

Nathan Muir:
Five minutes.

Tom Bishop:
Can't we discuss it over coffee?

Nathan Muir:
You just lost ten seconds.



User Review

In response to the negative reviews

Rating: 10/10

I can't believe some of the nonsense I've read here. People are
complaining
that Redford looked too old in the flashback scenes — for one, I thought
he
looked believable. Secondly, Hollywood hasn't cloned Redford in a vat yet
so
we'll just have to live with scenes like this. So get over it. Others
complain that the movie is somehow BORING, which blows my mind,
considering
it's non-stop, fast paced action and dialogue. If you're attention span is
too short for this movie I'm sure you'll enjoy crap like "XXX". Others
complain about messy plot logic (how did a CIA operative get into a
Chinese
prison? Huuu duhh, I dunno! It's a popcorn flick you morons! It's not a
900
page novel or a documentary). The plot takes a few leaps here and there,
but
a Snake Eyes or Face/Off this film is not. I read complaints about the
'arty', flashy 'MTV' style editing and filming techniques — I actually
thought the movie was filmed and edited superbly and the contemporary,
TV-commercial style actually complemented the film. It's crisp, tight,
taut
and entertaining. You get the feeling this is a high-quality production,
whereas with something like "Mission Impossible 2" the same type of style
is
implemented but it comes off feeling cheap. Not here, not with this movie.
As with Enemy of the State, it works. I have a feeling some of the people
that thought it was boring simply couldn't follow what was going on. The
plot does make sense if you have the attention span to keep up.