Apocalypto

December 8th, 2006







Advertisments





more trailers Apocalypto

Still of Rudy Youngblood in ApocalyptoApocalyptoMel Gibson at event of ApocalyptoApocalyptoStill of Mel Gibson in ApocalyptoStill of Rudy Youngblood in Apocalypto

Plot
As the Mayan kingdom faces its decline, the rulers insist the key to prosperity is to build more temples and offer human sacrifices. Jaguar Paw, a young man captured for sacrifice, flees to avoid his fate.

Release Year: 2006

Rating: 7.8/10 (119,977 voted)

Critic's Score: 68/100

Director: Mel Gibson

Stars: Gerardo Taracena, Raoul Trujillo, Dalia Hernández

Storyline
In the Maya civilization, a peaceful tribe is brutally attacked by warriors seeking slaves and human beings for sacrifice for their gods. Jaguar Paw hides his pregnant wife and his son in a deep hole nearby their tribe and is captured while fighting with his people. An eclipse spares his life from the sacrifice and later he has to fight to survive and save his beloved family.

Writers: Mel Gibson, Farhad Safinia

Cast:
Rudy Youngblood - Jaguar Paw
Dalia Hernández - Seven
Jonathan Brewer - Blunted
Morris Birdyellowhead - Flint Sky
Carlos Emilio Báez - Turtles Run
Amilcar Ramírez - Curl Nose
Israel Contreras - Smoke Frog
Israel Ríos - Cocoa Leaf
María Isabel Díaz - Mother in Law (as Isabel Diaz)
Espiridion Acosta Cache - Old Story Teller
Mayra Serbulo - Young Woman
Iazua Larios - Sky Flower
Lorena Heranandez - Village Girl
Itandehui Gutierrez - Wife
Sayuri Gutierrez - Eldest Daughter

Taglines: When the end comes, not everyone is ready to go



Details

Official Website: Official site [Germany] | Quinta Communications [France] |

Release Date: 8 December 2006

Filming Locations: Catemaco, Veracruz, Mexico

Box Office Details

Budget: $40,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend: $15,005,604 (USA) (10 December 2006)

Gross: $50,859,889 (USA) (4 March 2007)



Technical Specs

Runtime:



Did You Know?

Trivia:
The Jaguar's attack in the film is portrayed accurately, with the cat attacking the skull, rather than the throat. Unique among the other big cats, as where Lions, Cheetahs, Tigers, and Leopards asphyxiate their prey with a bite to the throat, Jaguars kill with a penetrating bite to the brain.

Goofs:
Anachronisms: The buildings in the city co-mingle architectural styles from three separate Mayan civilizations: Tikal Classic Maya (800 CE), Puuc (c.1050 CE), and El Mirador, a Pre-Classic metropolis that existed around the year 1 CE. If they wanted to portray Aztecs, this was definitely not their architectural style. If they wanted to portray Mayans, those civilizations disappeared long before the arrival of European ships.

Quotes:
[first lines]
title card: "A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within." W. Durant



User Review

I couldn't believe two hours had gone by that quickly

Rating: 9/10

Having some Mexican-Indian blood in me, I've always been interested in what I could read about the Aztecs and Mayans and others. But never did I achieve as elaborate a vision in my head, try as I might, as Mel Gibson has with the beautiful Apocalypto. Is it accurate? I've more than just strong doubts in at least one case, but like all good fiction, it probably tells more truth, despite its inaccuracies, than a dozen scholarly tomes. The movie is engrossing and, even more difficult, plausible and quite evocative. I would have bet any amount of money that this movie was impossible to make. And though some have complained that the film's ending involves an historical inaccuracy, I think there was more than enough reason to put it in.

There's a strong story that reminded me of other Third World folklore I've read, only better. In a lot of ways these people could have been North American Indians, but somehow that's not much of a criticism. And Gibson's recent PR problems only highlighted, for me, how it took an Australian-reared actor to make an exciting film about natives before Columbus. Clearly Hollywood is incapable of even conceiving of such a movie, much less bringing it brilliantly to life. Hollywood has an agenda and very narrow perspectives. It's agenda has no room for illuminating the humanity of non-Westerners, and there's too much relying on the same old set of sensibilities and intuition. I think if Hollywood is up in arms it ought to be because Gibson is making them look inept.

But as to this particular subject matter, there's no doubt in my mind that what fascinates most Anglos about the Aztecs and the Maya is the idea of human sacrifice. Gibson depicts the ritual as having an element of frenzy to it, and he may be right, but what is more convincing to me, at least, is his idea of what a village raid must have been like. His point by point reconstruction is pretty compelling, and I'm quite sure he could make some early American military raids on Indian villages so vivid and unforgettable that grown men would cry. I only hope he does, but as to this film, I would have depicted the human sacrifice with a nod toward a notion most Anglos find completely foreign, namely that these people understood that gain often entails pain, and they were willing to pay the price. Was it really so unreasonable that these people thought God might want them to create pain, and not just endure it, to gain His favor given that life entails so much struggle anyway? That willingness to endure pain clearly survives today, not the desire to create it in others, and that's the only point I would have added to this wonderful film.









[shareaholic app="recommendations" id="21160979"]

Comments:


Advertisments